Back to Blog
AI

Practical Prompt Engineering Patterns for Production LLM Apps

Developer Hub
1/17/2026
2 min read min read

Prompting is engineering, not magic. Here are patterns that consistently help production LLM features behave.

Core patterns

  • System priming: set role and guardrails up front; keep it short to save tokens.
  • Few-shot with contrast: include both good and bad examples; annotate why an example is invalid.
  • Chain-of-thought (streamlined): request concise reasoning only when needed; avoid verbose traces in latency-sensitive paths.
  • Tool-first: instruct the model to call tools/functions instead of free-text answers when structured output is required.

Output control

  • Enforce JSON schemas and validate with Zod before using responses.
  • Use enumerations (“choose one of: A|B|C”) to constrain intent classification.
  • Post-process with regex or a secondary lightweight model to tighten formats.

Latency and cost hygiene

  • Keep context windows lean: strip stopwords in retrieval, dedupe similar chunks, cap history length.
  • Prefer smaller, cheaper models for classification/routing; reserve larger models for generation.
  • Cache deterministic prompts (e.g., policies) and reuse embeddings.

Evaluation

  • Create prompt unit tests with known inputs/expected outputs; run them in CI.
  • Track drift: log prompt versions, model IDs, and latency histograms per route.
  • Add guardrail checks: PII leakage, profanity, and policy violations before responses reach users.

Next steps

  • Stand up a prompt registry (e.g., versioned JSON) to track changes.
  • Add automatic schema validation and retries with backoff for malformed responses.
  • Build a small golden dataset and run it nightly to detect regressions after model updates.